Go to content
${facet.Name} (${facet.TotalResults})
${item.Icon}
${ item.ShortDescription }
${ item.SearchLabel?.ViewModel?.Label }
See all results
${facet.Name} (${facet.TotalResults})
${item.Icon}
${ item.ShortDescription }
${ item.SearchLabel?.ViewModel?.Label }
See all results

Offshore Litigation Blog

Knight chess piece on a 2x2 board

${totalItems} results

${customFilterHeading} Showing ${showingItems} of ${totalItems} results ${searchTerm}
${facet.Name} (${facet.TotalResults})
Reset
Walking the tightrope - Illegally obtained evidence, privilege and the iniquity exception
In two recent cases, the British Virgin Islands Commercial Court had the opportunity to clarify the effect of section 125 of the Evidence Act 2006 (the Act). This provides that the Court is obliged to carry out a balancing act between the manner in which the evidence was obtained and the desirability of admitting it.
Overriding legal professional privilege - The iniquity exception
A decision of the English High Court released earlier this month deals with the important issue which arises when instructions and communications between a lawyer and their client are not protected by legal professional privilege if the lawyer is instructed for the purpose of furthering or concealing a crime, fraud or other iniquity, whether or not the lawyer is aware of the wrongful purpose – the so-called "iniquity exception".
${ item.Title }
${ item.Description }