Offshore Litigation Blog

In 2017, Singapore incorporated the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (the ‘Model Law’) into its domestic legislation,1 providing a comprehensive and structured framework for the recognition and assistance of foreign corporate insolvency proceedings.

Section 36(13) of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act (2021 Revision) (‘ELPA’) gives the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands the power to override a limited partnership agreement and replace the general partner (‘GP’) of an exempted limited partnership (‘ELP’) during its winding up, if necessary for a proper dissolution.

In a recent decision of the Cayman Islands Grand Court, Justice Asif KC granted leave to serve foreign defendants out of the jurisdiction and extended the validity of a writ to accommodate service under the Hague Convention: Linksure Global Ltd v Infinite Solution Ltd.

In the recent decision of RCF VII Sponsor LLC v Blue Gold Ltd, the Cayman Islands Grand Court granted an interim injunction restraining the Defendant company from holding an extraordinary general meeting, demonstrating the Court’s flexible approach to injunctions and cross-undertakings where the balance of convenience favours early judicial intervention.

Harneys secured a significant recovery of approximately €9 million for our client through garnishee (attachment of debt) proceedings against two major banks in Cyprus.

The Cayman Islands Court of Appeal has issued a strong warning on the risks of using generative artificial intelligence in court proceedings in the recent decision in Samuel Johnson v Cayman Islands Health Services Authority [2025] CICA (Civ) 15 (Johnson v HSA).

In Sandoz AG v Bayer Intellectual Property GMBH, the English High Court provided important clarification that a claimant in an inquiry for damages is not entitled to an account of profits under the standard cross-undertaking as to damages.

The Privy Council has just handed down judgment in Fang Ankong & Anor v Green Elite (in liquidation) which clearly restates how the Duomatic principle is to be applied and, in particular, the need for certainty, knowledge and an actual assent that can be objectively established.

In Maso Capital Investments Ltd v Trina Solar Ltd the Privy Council reinstated the first instance decision of the Grand Court, confirming that the task for the trial judge in an assessment of fair value pursuant to section 238 of the Companies Act (as revised) is highly fact specific and will depend on the relative reliability of the valuation methodologies contended for.

The decision of Justice Mangatal in Ming v JF Ming Inc is the latest judgment from the long-running family dispute and unfair prejudice proceedings over JF Ming Inc (JFM), a BVI holding company with subsidiaries holding substantial real estate in Hong Kong.

In Hyalroute Communication Group Limited v Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) (Hyalroute), the Hong Kong Court dismissed an application by a Cayman Islands-incorporated company for anti-suit relief to restrain a creditor from filing a winding-up petition in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands.

In the recent decision of Suning International Group Co Ltd v Carrefour Nederland BV the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal provided guidance on the procedure to be followed under Order 73, rule 31(6) of the Grand Court Rules for service of proceedings to enforce a foreign arbitral award.