Go to content
${facet.Name} (${facet.TotalResults})
${item.Icon}
${ item.ShortDescription }
${ item.SearchLabel?.ViewModel?.Label }
See all results
${facet.Name} (${facet.TotalResults})
${item.Icon}
${ item.ShortDescription }
${ item.SearchLabel?.ViewModel?.Label }
See all results

ESMA issues statements on MiCAR transitional measures and grandfathering periods for CASPs

29 Jan 2025
|

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has recently issued a statement on transitional measures and a list of grandfathering periods under Regulation 1114/2023 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCAR). These transitional periods are critical for crypto asset service providers (CASPs) already operating before 30 December 2024, offering them a limited timeframe to obtain a licence under MiCA.

content headings-paste as plain text

Under Article 143(3) of MiCAR, CASPs active before 30 December 2024, may continue providing services until 1 July 2026, or until they receive or are denied MiCAR authorisation, whichever comes first. However, individual Member States may reduce or waive this transitional period, depending on their existing national frameworks.

Grandfathering periods by jurisdiction

The duration of the transitional regime varies, with some Member States opting for shorter periods to enhance market stability and investor protection. Below is a summary of the grandfathering periods:

Member state
Grandfathering period
Member state
Grandfathering period
BelgiumTBALithuania5 months
Bulgaria12 monthsLuxembourg18 months
Czechia18 monthsHungary6 months
Denmark18 monthsMalta18 months
GermanyTBANetherlands6 months
Estonia18 monthsAustria12 months
Ireland12 monthsPoland6 months
Greece12 monthsPortugalTBA
Spain12 monthsRomania18 months
France18 monthsSlovenia6 months
Croatia18 monthsSlovakia12 months
Italy12 monthsFinland6 months
Cyprus18 monthsSweden9 months
Latvia6 months

European Economic Area (EEA) countries

EEA country
Grandfathering period
Iceland18 months
LiechtensteinTBA
Norway12 months

Note: Some periods reflect current expectations and may not yet be formalised in national law. Specific requirements also apply, such as early application deadlines to benefit from grandfathering.

Compliance challenges and recommendations

The divergence in timelines in each Member State create complex compliance requirements for CASPs operating across multiple jurisdictions. For example, if a CASP secures MiCAR authorisation in a Member State with a longer transitional period but serves clients in a state with a shorter one, a compliance gap could arise. This scenario may disrupt services and impact market participants.

To address these challenges, ESMA advises CASPs to:

  • Apply for MiCAR authorisation as early as possible
  • Engage proactively with National Competent Authorities (NCAs) in each jurisdiction
  • Implement robust strategies to avoid service disruptions and ensure compliance

NCAs should coordinate closely across borders to streamline authorisation processes and prevent market disruptions. Early and continuous dialogue between home and host Member States is essential to safeguarding market integrity and client interests.

MiCAR’s transitional measures and country-specific grandfathering periods pose significant operational challenges for CASPs. Timely applications, strategic planning and regulatory engagement are crucial to ensuring compliance and uninterrupted service.

ESMA’s statement can be found here and the official list of grandfathering periods as decided by Member States can be accessed here.

If you are unsure whether MiCAR may apply to you, you can use our MiCA Assessment Tool to obtain a free preliminary assessment here.