Bankers and Registered Agents in UK offshore jurisdictions need to be able to execute payment requests with the comfort that doing so with reasonable skill and diligence will protect them from becoming defendants to fraud claims in circumstances where funds are misappropriated.
The duty to provide such services with reasonable skill and diligence was recently considered by the UK Supreme Court in the context of the infamous ‘Quincecare Duty’ of a service provider to refrain from making payments to agents acting on behalf of a provider’s customers if they have reasonable grounds to believe the agents are acting fraudulently. The Supreme Court decision in Philipp v. Barclays Bank sheds light on the scope of this duty. How should a bank, or others, display a reasonable level of diligence to prevent fraud?
This article was originally published in Reuters/Westlaw Today. Download the PDF to read in full.
Related content
Offshore Litigation Blog
Is this an agreement to arbitrate? – A case concerning multiple dispute resolution clauses
Offshore Litigation Blog
UK Court Underscores its Discretion in Unfair Prejudice Cases
Offshore Litigation Blog
The standard of proof as to the existence of an arbitration agreement in an application for an anti-suit injunction – the Hong Kong Court departs from the position under England & Wales