Offshore Litigation

Blog

Offshore Litigation

Contributors

Jonathan Addo
Jonathan Addo
  • Jonathan Addo

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Ian Mann
Ian Mann
  • Ian Mann

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Nick Hoffman
Nick Hoffman
  • Nick Hoffman

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Vicky Lord
Vicky Lord
  • Vicky Lord

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Chai Ridgers
Chai Ridgers
  • Chai Ridgers

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
William Peake
William Peake
  • William Peake

  • Partner
  • London
Peter Ferrer
Peter Ferrer
  • Peter Ferrer

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jeremy Child
Jeremy Child
  • Jeremy Child

  • Partner
  • London
Claire Goldstein
Claire Goldstein
  • Claire Goldstein

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jayson Wood
Jayson Wood
  • Jayson Wood

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Phillip Kite
Phillip Kite
  • Phillip Kite

  • Partner
  • London
Stuart Cullen
Stuart Cullen
  • Stuart Cullen

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Lorinda Peasland
Lorinda Peasland
  • Lorinda Peasland

  • Consultant
  • Hong Kong
Paul Madden
Paul Madden
  • Paul Madden

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Jessica Williams
Jessica Williams
  • Jessica Williams

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Paula Kay
Paula Kay
  • Paula Kay

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Andrew Thorp
Andrew Thorp
  • Andrew Thorp

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Henry Mander
Henry Mander
  • Henry Mander

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Johnstone
Andrew Johnstone
  • Andrew Johnstone

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Nicola Roberts
Nicola Roberts
  • Nicola Roberts

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Julie Engwirda
Julie Engwirda
  • Julie Engwirda

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Paul Smith
Paul Smith
  • Paul Smith

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands

Is a breakdown in mutual trust and confidence enough to wind a company up?

In the recent English Court of Appeal decision in the matter of Paramount Powders (UK) Ltd (the Company), the appellant was removed as a director of the Company, following which he petitioned the Court for an order that the Company (which was a quasi-partnership between him and his brothers) be wound up. 

At the core of the appellant’s petition at first instance were complaints that his brothers were in breach of fiduciary duties in respect of their conduct in what he characterised as establishing businesses that competed with the Company. In the circumstances it was just and equitable for the Company to be wound up given that there was a breakdown in trust and confidence between him and his brothers.

At first instance and on appeal, it was determined that it was the appellant who was in breach of fiduciary duties; that it was appropriate in the circumstances for him to have been excluded from the management of the Company; and that the breakdown in mutual trust and confidence between them was not enough by itself, to justify the winding up of the Company. The Court further found that a petitioner (as in this case) may not qualify for relief if he is “solely responsible for the situation which has arisen”.

Notwithstanding the above, the Court has cautioned that not every instance of a fiduciary breach would be enough to satisfy the exclusion of a former participant in a quasi-partnership company.

Is a breakdown in mutual trust and confidence enough to wind a company up?

Leave A Comment