Offshore Litigation

Blog

Offshore Litigation

Contributors

Jonathan Addo
Jonathan Addo
  • Jonathan Addo

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Ian Mann
Ian Mann
  • Ian Mann

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Nick Hoffman
Nick Hoffman
  • Nick Hoffman

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Vicky Lord
Vicky Lord
  • Vicky Lord

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Chai Ridgers
Chai Ridgers
  • Chai Ridgers

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
William Peake
William Peake
  • William Peake

  • Partner
  • London
Peter Ferrer
Peter Ferrer
  • Peter Ferrer

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
James Noble
James Noble
  • James Noble

  • Partner
  • Singapore
Jeremy Child
Jeremy Child
  • Jeremy Child

  • Partner
  • London
Claire Goldstein
Claire Goldstein
  • Claire Goldstein

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Jayson Wood
Jayson Wood
  • Jayson Wood

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Phillip Kite
Phillip Kite
  • Phillip Kite

  • Partner
  • London
Stuart Cullen
Stuart Cullen
  • Stuart Cullen

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Lorinda Peasland
Lorinda Peasland
  • Lorinda Peasland

  • Consultant
  • Hong Kong
Paul Madden
Paul Madden
  • Paul Madden

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Jessica Williams
Jessica Williams
  • Jessica Williams

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Paula Kay
Paula Kay
  • Paula Kay

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Andrew Thorp
Andrew Thorp
  • Andrew Thorp

  • Partner
  • British Virgin Islands
Henry Mander
Henry Mander
  • Henry Mander

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands
Andrew Johnstone
Andrew Johnstone
  • Andrew Johnstone

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Nicola Roberts
Nicola Roberts
  • Nicola Roberts

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Julie Engwirda
Julie Engwirda
  • Julie Engwirda

  • Partner
  • Hong Kong
Paul Smith
Paul Smith
  • Paul Smith

  • Partner
  • Cayman Islands

This is not a wind up: BVI court approves restructuring provisional liquidation

In a major development in BVI insolvency law and practice, the BVI Commercial Court has held in the case of Constellation Overseas Limited and 5 others (BVIHC (Com) 2018/0206 – 2012) that provisional liquidation is available to facilitate a restructuring. The decision brings the BVI broadly into line with Cayman and Bermuda, where restructuring provisional liquidations have been used to support a number of landmark cross-border restructurings in recent years.

In the proceedings six BVI companies (part of a group headquartered in Brazil) sought the appointment of provisional liquidators to support the group’s restructuring, which is driven by a Brazilian Judicial Reorganisation procedure. That was in turn supported by Chapter 15 proceedings in the USA. The companies required the protection against “predatory creditor claims” afforded by the moratorium imposed by a BVI provisional liquidation; there was no current intention to wind up the BVI companies or the group.  

The judge found that the BVI Court has a “very wide common law jurisdiction” to appoint provisional liquidators for restructuring purposes, based on authority from the courts of England, Cayman and Bermuda (amongst others).  He distinguished certain Hong Kong cases that suggested that provisional liquidation was only available in that jurisdiction where the objective was a liquidation.

The essence of a restructuring provisional liquidation is that the company remains in the day to day control of its directors, but enjoys protection from claims by individual creditors. The objective is to provide a better outcome for creditors than would be likely on a winding up. The judge also found that “there is persuasive authority in England for using [provisional liquidation] in support of… a foreign restructuring process.

The key determining factors in favour of granting the order in this case were:

  1. the companies were cashflow (but not balance sheet) insolvent;
  2. there was a real prospect of a restructuring being achieved, resulting in a better outcome for creditors than would be the case on a winding up;
  3. the application was supported by a number of the group’s major creditors.

This ruling is to be welcomed as adding to the range of effective procedures available in the BVI to facilitate cross border restructurings. 

However, the judge’s decision to import what may be described as “radical” innovations into a largely codified statutory insolvency regime may reignite the debate over the extent to which this is appropriate in insolvency law (see Singularis v PwC).  As such, the decision will certainly influence the current debate in the BVI on reforms to the insolvency legislation.

This is not a wind up: BVI court approves restructuring provisional liquidation

Leave A Comment